HPE ProCurve and Cisco FabricPath compete in the network solutions category, aiming to enhance connectivity and efficiency. Cisco FabricPath seems to have the upper hand with its superior features, justifying its higher price with robust capabilities.
Features: HPE ProCurve features straightforward network management, a scalable architecture, and an intuitive menu-based interface. Cisco FabricPath offers advanced data center capabilities, high performance through multipath networking, and reliable security features.
Room for Improvement: HPE ProCurve could enhance its performance for more complex networking needs, improve its advanced data center capabilities, and update its user interface for better efficiency. Cisco FabricPath could work on simplifying deployment procedures, providing more user-friendly interfaces, and lowering initial costs to appeal more to budget-conscious businesses.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE ProCurve is known for its uncomplicated deployment process, appealing to organizations with limited IT resources, and comes with good community support. Cisco FabricPath, although more complex to deploy, is supported by comprehensive technical assistance.
Pricing and ROI: HPE ProCurve offers a lower initial setup cost, appealing for budget-conscious businesses, and provides quick ROI due to efficient network management. Cisco FabricPath demands a higher initial investment but delivers significant long-term ROI through superior network performance and stability.
Based on my experience with technical support from Cisco, they are helpful and responsive; they respond based on severity.
Cisco provides excellent support.
The need to frequently contact support suggests we are not getting sufficient effectiveness from the service.
Cisco FabricPath is stable.
It is 60 to 70% stable, depending on usage intensity.
Additionally, parts availability in these regions needs improvement to address hardware failure situations, such as the availability of parts like a power cable.
In future updates, I would prefer to see features such as more AI functionality or better integration added to Cisco FabricPath.
When running bots, the system occasionally gets stuck, requiring reboots which result in memory loss and data loss.
Additionally, many products have subscriptions, making it very expensive when you bundle all together.
While pricing is slightly on the higher side, the overall assessment, which includes cost and technical capabilities, often favors Cisco.
For market-related sites, AWS pricing becomes significantly higher compared to DigitalOcean.
Cisco is the best choice in terms of cost, quality, and post-procurement services.
I have experienced operational efficiencies with Cisco FabricPath that are 200% better than the old legacy equipment and protocols.
It offers easy scalability and migration between different configurations.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
