Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

Dell Technologies and VMware are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Dell Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while VMware is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. Dell Technologies holds a 3.9% mindshare in DRS, compared to VMware’s 8.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Read 15 Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines reviews

2,421 Views
1,184 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 80 VMware Live Recovery reviews

5,497 Views
2,238 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines and VMware Live Recovery are solutions in the virtualization recovery space. Dell RecoverPoint has an advantage in pricing and support, while VMware Live Recovery is favored for its feature set and value despite higher costs.

Features: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines delivers robust data protection, rapid recovery, and continuous replication, ensuring efficient recovery points. VMware Live Recovery focuses on high availability, instant recovery, and seamless integration with VMware environments, providing advanced features that stand out in VMware-centric setups.

Room for Improvement: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines could enhance its integration with non-VMware environments and improve advanced recovery features to compete better with feature-rich solutions. It may also benefit from refining its UI for easier navigation. VMware Live Recovery might improve its cost-effectiveness and simplify the deployment process for users outside the VMware ecosystem. Additionally, reducing the complexity of integration with third-party tools could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines offers a simpler deployment process backed by strong customer support, facilitating quick problem resolution. VMware Live Recovery's deployment is more complex but benefits from integration with VMware tools and strong technical support channels. Dell offers a user-friendly experience, while VMware provides advantages for existing VMware infrastructure users.

Pricing and ROI: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines presents a cost-effective setup with strong ROI potential through resource efficiency and low operational overheads. VMware Live Recovery requires higher initial investment but provides comprehensive features and compatibility with VMware ecosystems, offering significant long-term benefits despite upfront costs. Dell is more immediately cost-effective, whereas VMware delivers returns in advanced feature priority environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is 3.9%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 8.1%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

ClaudioSalgado

IT Architect Consultant at RTFM

Offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites

It offers key features like any point-in-time recovery without needing scheduled snapshots. It allows for automated VM protection during processes like failover and testing, and it offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites. It also provides IP address management when network configurations differ across sites.

Read full review

Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga

IT Infrastructure Manager at TMLI

The capability and the functionality of the features are very helpful for us

We use VMware Live Recovery for creating new hosts and new servers. We synchronize all of our software from our data center to our co-location in real time, so when a disaster happens, we switch to the co-location The functionality of the features is helpful for us. We find the resource…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very simple tool to use and offers flexibility in using the tool for recovery and transitioning from one state to another."

"The speed and the footprint the solution uses regarding storage are great."

"The solution is quite stable. We haven't experienced any kind of bug or glitch. We haven't experienced crashes."

"The workload can be moved directly if the disaster site is the main site."

"Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines offers key features like any point-in-time recovery without needing scheduled snapshots."

"The most valuable feature is that it is journal-based and you don't have to replicate a lot of data."

"The most valuable features are the data center recovery administration and the time of recovery."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines pros

"I give VMware Live Recovery a rating of ten out of ten."

"It is a stable solution...The solution's technical support is excellent."

"The replication is the solution's most valuable feature. If we have some issues on the VM in the main site we can migrate it to another site automatically."

"Automated recovery is one good feature, SRM also offers simplified management. It has a centralized interface for configuring, testing, and executing disaster recovery plans across multiple sites. This means management from a single point, even for many sites."

"Technical support is very proactive and helpful."

"The solution is very flexible."

"The solution is strong when it comes to protection and analytics, with the latter being added later on."

"Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"It would be good to have a critical application on the customer side."

"It can have better integration. It would be good if, in addition to VMware VM, it can also support other hypervisors. I also want to see support for Oracle databases. As of now, it supports only SQL and Exchange. It would be good to also support other databases."

"In some cases, the response times could improve, but we haven't had issues with their support."

"The biggest challenge we faced was attempting replication between two different kinds of storage systems, like IBM on one side and Dell EMC storage systems on the other, before opting for VPLEX."

"The solution currently supports only VMware. There is increasing demand for compatibility with other hypervisors, such as Hyper V and KVM Proxmox. Additionally, licensing has become less flexible and more expensive."

"The solution currently supports only VMware."

"In the next release of this software, I would like to see options that help to decrease the bandwidth required, such as compressing the data."

"The biggest challenge we faced was attempting replication between two different kinds of storage systems, like IBM on one side and Dell EMC storage systems on the other, before opting for VPLEX."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines cons

"The initial setup of VMware SRM isn't straightforward because many customizations are required since it helps in the recovery of your IT environment."

"This product is not appropriate for those moving to a broader cloud footprint."

"There are many functionality problems with the product currently. It is also slow and unstable."

"The version we are currently using is not the latest and greatest but it has buggy behavior in some browsers."

"I would like to see better integration with other storage solutions. I would hope to see that within the next two or three years."

"The solution is on the expensive side."

"It would be better if we could get more reporting features in VMware SRM."

"If you have a failover case, you need to work on it manually. It would be helpful if this could be automated. It would simplify things."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive. If one means cheaply priced and ten means expensive, I rate the tool's price as a seven."

"This is an expensive product."

"There is a license required for this solution and the pricing depends on how many virtual machines you have."

"This is not a very cheap solution and compared to others, it is expensive."

"It was a part of a backup solution. So, it was free for us."

"Pricing-wise, it is pretty much fair for any customer who only has a VMware environment. Licensing is based on the number of VMs that you want to protect at any given point in time. Licensing is not based on size."

"It is an expensive platform. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."

"The level of licensing required for this solution is dependent on the server instances in use."

"Compare to hardware-based replication, I think software based replication is best and cheap."

"It is reasonably priced, and its cost hasn't been a significant factor in our implementation."

"The cost of SRM is a little bit high, especially for smaller companies."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for VMware SRM, which is not very expensive."

"The price could be lower, in general. My clients pay for an annual license."

"SRM is reasonably priced for the functionality it provides."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

One of the standout features of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is its real-time data protection capability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Most of the time, we buy perpetual license solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Although we can change the IP address, it would be good to have some other sort of orchestration to make life easier to manage when we failover.

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We use a three-year license, and the cost for VMware Live Recovery can be high. Previously, when acquiring a license for Ethiopian drug supply chains, the price was significantly high, especially a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

The licensing area needs improvement as the cost per virtual machine is high. If they offered discounts or minimized their prices, it would be more beneficial.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 26% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 21% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 3% of the time

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 24% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

JetStream DR vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

June 2025

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines report

Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

May 2025

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines enables quick recovery of VMware virtual machines and allows you to efficiently test, manage and orchestrate operational backup and disaster recovery operations.

With tight integration with VMware, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is storage and application agnostic, with built-in automation accessible via VMware vSphere web client plug-in.

When cloud becomes a vital part of your disaster recovery strategy, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is also web-enabled, providing efficient replication to AWS and VMware Cloud on AWS.

RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is available as part of Dell Data Protection Suite.

Dell Technologies

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

VMware

Sample Customers

Rushmore Electric Power Cooperative, PCS Publishing, Noble Foods

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery

June 2025

Free Report: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.