HPE BladeSystem vs HPE Synergy comparison

HPE BladeSystem and HPE Synergy are competitors in the server infrastructure market. HPE BladeSystem holds an advantage in performance and cost-effectiveness, while HPE Synergy excels in flexibility due to its composability.

Features: HPE BladeSystem is praised for its high performance, reliability, and the manageability of features like iLO and Insight Management, which facilitate scalability, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. HPE Synergy offers composability for dynamic resource allocation and reduced hardware needs, making it flexible for various workloads, enhanced by its centralized management and the ability to reuse resources.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem faces challenges in scalability due to chassis design and compatibility with newer hardware, requiring better upgrade paths and tools. Users also seek improved support for older products. HPE Synergy is noted for its high pricing and setup complexity, with user desires for better integration with non-HPE platforms and streamlined processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem is known for straightforward on-premises deployments, integrating well with existing systems but limited in hybrid environments. HPE Synergy handles hybrid cloud setups but can complicate implementation. Both products receive positive feedback on responsive technical support, though BladeSystem support may vary, while Synergy remains consistent but slow on complex issues.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem is seen as cost-effective, with moderate initial costs leading to significant ROI via reduced operational expenses. HPE Synergy, despite higher costs, is valued for substantial ROI from efficient resource use and less additional infrastructure investment. Both demonstrate long-term savings and reliability.