HPE ProCurve and Cisco Catalyst Switches compete in the advanced networking solutions category. HPE ProCurve edges ahead with pricing and ease of deployment, while Cisco Catalyst is preferred for its advanced features that justify the cost difference.
Features: HPE ProCurve offers an intuitive menu-based interface, lifetime warranty, and energy-efficient design. Cisco Catalyst provides enhanced stability, advanced security features, and flexible deployment options.
Room for Improvement: HPE ProCurve could improve its scalability and offer more comprehensive security features. Enhancing advanced configuration options would also benefit users. For Cisco Catalyst, reducing complexity in setup and more competitive pricing would be beneficial. Their customer support system could also be streamlined for easier access.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE ProCurve is noted for easy deployment and user-friendly interface. Its customer service is efficient, offering replacements under a lifetime warranty. Cisco Catalyst, though complex in deployment, is backed by extensive resources and specialized support services adding value despite the initial complexity.
Pricing and ROI: HPE ProCurve is cost-effective with favorable ROI due to its affordable setup costs and efficiency. Cisco Catalyst involves a higher initial cost but offers higher ROI through superior performance and durability, aligning with businesses focused on long-term investment.
From an investment standpoint, deploying Cisco Catalyst Switches offers tangible benefits, including cost reductions.
Cisco support is very good and responsive.
Cisco's support is good, one of the best supports that you will get.
I am paying for Cisco support and would rate it nine out of ten.
The need to frequently contact support suggests we are not getting sufficient effectiveness from the service.
The scalability of Cisco Catalyst Switches is very much scalable, as it supports the stacking feature and growth; for instance, with 94K modular switches, based on the requirement, we can even increase modules for more bandwidth.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are scalable, and I would rate them eight to nine out of ten for scalability.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are stable.
It is 60 to 70% stable, depending on usage intensity.
Currently, I don't see much AI integration with Cisco Catalyst Switches; though they've started, it still needs improvement.
The configuration options on the Cisco Commerce website could be more efficient.
There could be improvements in the repeat configuration with some file integration that is currently missing.
When running bots, the system occasionally gets stuck, requiring reboots which result in memory loss and data loss.
Cisco provides unique features that justify their pricing.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are quite pricey.
Cisco usually is costly compared to other vendors.
For market-related sites, AWS pricing becomes significantly higher compared to DigitalOcean.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are valuable for their reliability and performance.
Catalyst Switches are efficient and swift, which is valuable for my organization.
The most beneficial features for our network management are their stability and good customer support.
It offers easy scalability and migration between different configurations.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are a reliable and scalable network switching and routing solution, focusing on VLANs and VLAN switching. They are used as access switches, distribution switches, and core switches in various environments, deployed on-premises, and used for long connections. The switches are easy to configure, install, and upgrade and offer good pricing.
The most valuable features include warranty and firmware support, stability, security, good performance, flexibility, etc. The Cisco Catalyst Switches have provided a stable solution for the organizations and are widely used, trusted, and well-known in the networking industry.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
