Harness vs Tekton comparison

Harness and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Harness is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Harness holds a 7.3% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Harness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Google users who would recommend it.

Harness

Read 4 Harness reviews

2,128 Views
1,289 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 36 Tekton reviews

4,437 Views
2,094 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Harness

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Harness and Tekton compete in the CI/CD platform market. Harness often gains the upper hand due to its ease of use and robust features, while Tekton appeals to teams needing high customization.

Features: Harness provides automated Canary and Blue-Green deployments, intuitive cloud cost management, and straightforward UI for simplified workflows. Tekton offers pipeline modularity and integrates seamlessly with existing DevOps tools, emphasizing flexibility and adaptability. Harness is user-friendly, whereas Tekton serves teams craving customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Harness offers a fast deployment model with extensive customer support, making it suitable for teams with limited technical resources. Tekton requires a technical setup but fosters a community-driven approach, benefiting teams with internal expertise and innovation. Harness's strong customer service and detailed guides provide an advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Harness involves a higher setup cost, offering clear ROI through reduced deployment time and minimized risks. Tekton, being open-source, presents a low initial cost but demands investment in development resources for complex pipelines. Harness focuses on managed efficiency, while Tekton's affordability comes with increased in-house management requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Harness vs. Tekton Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Harness vs. Tekton

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 855,347 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Harness

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (29th), Cloud Cost Management (12th)

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Harness is 7.3%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 12.0%, up from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Streamline microservices deployment with integrated execution pipelines and comprehensive monitoring

Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place. It is very convenient since we have many microservices, so having one platform for all of them is beneficial. The dashboard allows me to monitor all core services' deployment status in one place, making it easier to find bugs and check logs.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution

Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place."

"Harness starts integrating with organizations, making everything automated without the need for manual interruption."

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

"The features of Harness are valuable, supporting rolling deployments, basic deployments, and blue-green deployments with zero downtime."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place, making it convenient."

"The 'promote' feature is beneficial as it simplifies deployment processes by allowing easy promotion of applications to different environments without needing to re-run CI/CD processes."

"You can isolate most Tekton assets in the Kubernetes namespace for your feature branch. This allows you to freely change Tekton assets and objects to adapt to your feature branch and requirements."

"The ability to scale is valuable."

"Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments."

"I would say the customization ability that Tekton provides is good."

"The product's best feature is its ease of implementation."

"Tekton is a stable product."

"Tekton is a cloud-native solution. It offers optimal resource consumption, allowing tasks to be run more efficiently and at a lower cost."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals."

"I prefer the previous less compact UI version of Harness, which showed more details on the screen."

"When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur. Improvements are needed when deploying one component to one environment."

"When integrating Harness with more than twenty applications in one place, it becomes less stable, causing improvements to be necessary."

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

"Configuring Tekton requires a deep understanding of Kubernetes, which can be difficult for developers."

"RBAC is really needed for Tekton."

"Tekton should include many features to integrate event-driven pipelines."

"Tekton lacks integration capabilities compared to other CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis."

"Tekton should have more accessibility for some rare use cases so that we can have more references when applying some techniques to our pipeline."

"For infrastructure deployment, integration is somewhat complex, especially when using Terraform with Tekton. It would be beneficial if this process were simplified."

"Some of the tool's cons include its minimalistic dashboard, which lacks detailed information and control compared to other tools like Jenkins or GitLab. Additionally, it's primarily used by Japanese companies."

"If you are a beginner, then accessing the flexibility part can be overwhelming. We think the learning curve of the tool is steep, especially for those who are not already familiar with Kubernetes."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product is free and open-source."

"The product is free of cost."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

855,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harness?

When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur. Improvements are needed when deploying one component to one environment.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Harness?

Our primary use case for Harness ( /products/harness-reviews ) is as a deployment tool. Although I am not a DevOps engineer, my team uses Harness ( /products/harness-reviews ) for deployment purpos...

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.

See all answers

Comparisons

Jenkins vs Harness

Compared 20% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Compared 19% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 13% of the time

GitLab vs Harness

Compared 8% of the time

Bamboo vs Harness

Compared 7% of the time

More Harness Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 33% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

CircleCI vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

May 2025

Download Harness product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

May 2025

Download Tekton product report

Also Known As

Armory

No data available

Overview

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Harness

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

Harness vs. Tekton

June 2025

Free Report: Harness vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about Harness vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

855,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Harness vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.