Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

Axonius and Qualys are both solutions in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category. Axonius is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while Qualys is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.2. Axonius holds a 35.2% mindshare in CASM, compared to Qualys’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 7 Axonius reviews

1,447 Views
379 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 22 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

269 Views
89 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Axonius and Qualys compete in the cybersecurity asset management category. Axonius shows an advantage in ease of use and integration capability, while Qualys excels with a broad range of features, appealing to comprehensive security needs.

Features: Axonius offers streamlined asset inventory, integration with over 900 sources, and a user-friendly interface that simplifies asset management with minimal setup. Qualys provides robust vulnerability management, real-time visibility into assets through cloud agents, and automated remediation solutions that cater to complex enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Axonius could enhance support for large-scale deployments, refine query-building tools, and expand its feature set for complex environments. Qualys may improve its deployment process for quicker set-up, offer a more intuitive user interface, and optimize integration with smaller systems to enhance accessibility and usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axonius is known for its rapid deployment and intuitive customer support, making it ideal for fast operational use. Qualys, despite its more complex deployment process, provides detailed support that suits large organizations needing comprehensive assistance and scalable implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Axonius generally incurs lower initial costs, appealing to budget-conscious companies with a focus on rapid deployment benefits. Qualys tends to involve higher upfront expenses, justified by its extensive feature set providing long-term value through comprehensive security management.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (5th)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

3rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (8th), Patch Management (6th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (3rd), Software Supply Chain Security (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of Axonius is 35.2%, down from 40.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 7.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

Featured Reviews

Ashok Gunnia

Sr. IT Automation Technical Consultant at IBM

Integrates with ServiceNow and provides alerts for deviations

The most valuable feature of Axonius is its ability to deduplicate records and identify which ones are old and stale versus those more relevant. For example, if you haven't logged in today but a system somewhere else mentions you have, Axonius can detect this through various logs like Active Directory, file logging, or Wi-Fi connections. Traditionally, someone would have to make numerous calls and spend a lot of time to find out if you are on-site or connected to a Wi-Fi network. The tool simplifies this process. From my experience, onboarding and adding connectors was pretty easy, especially when integrating with the ServiceNow environment. It worked well for my use case, but the ease of use can depend on the customer's specific needs and what they are trying to achieve.

Read full review

Scott Frederick

Director of Vulnerability Management at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Well-integrated with our vulnerability scanning utilities and efficient in asset tagging and identification

Our favorite features are the tagging and the ability to quickly find assets in the portal. Additionally, I do like the fact that Qualys CSAM is integrated with the rest of our vulnerability scanning utilities. We use the full suite from Qualys. The fact that it is integrated makes it very easy to understand. It shares tagging information with VMDR. That is very nice. Qualys CSAM has discovered assets not previously covered by our vulnerability management program. Primarily, if we have assets without vulnerabilities, they become less visible, but Qualys CSAM alerts us to them because they have IP addresses and are attached to our network. It could discover everything from printers to servers to endpoints. It could discover UPSs, network devices, and across all operating systems. It discovers our security badge readers and digital signage. We have to feed that the IP address ranges, but beyond that, it finds everything in our internal network. We were able to realize its benefits within the first quarter of installing it. We did have to take some time to learn it and understand how to operationally leverage what it was telling us, but it was very quick. In addition to vulnerabilities, Qualys CSAM helps identify other risk factors to a degree. For instance, we can see if servers or assets have incorrect naming standards. We have our network segmented into development model, test, and production, and we have server naming standards that identify which management they should be in. If a production server has the naming standard of a development model server, we can find that. That is one area we have used it for. We are not fully using TruRisk, but we are using the Qualys detection score that is central to our corporate risk prioritization approach. It has completely replaced our homegrown one.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time visibility Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides into all assets across our development and operational environments."

"The most valuable feature is the Management sensor, which helps identify gaps in policy agent availability, thereby improving agent utilization."

"The most valuable features of Qualys CSAM include the ability to manage authorized and unauthorized applications efficiently. This feature helps in validating applications and maintaining a secure environment."

"The best feature is asset discovery through their cloud agent or IP-based scanning."

"The integration with different third-party tools, such as cloud providers like Azure and AWS, and asset management tools like CMDB systems, is valuable."

"I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten."

"Our favorite features are the tagging and the ability to quickly find assets in the portal."

"Authorized and unauthorized software visibility is the best feature for me. It helps me understand security controls on our network and where we lack visibility. With a single security tool, we are able to get an extensive list."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"The main aspect that needs improvement is the user interface, which should be more intuitive."

"Based on the company's budget, Qualys offers limited features, which can also be utilized in other environments."

"In my opinion, the area that needs improvement is the role-based access control (RBAC). The access privilege management needs to be more robust and streamlined to enhance user access management."

"In our reporting, we faced a challenge syncing with cloud devices."

"In my opinion, the area that needs improvement is the role-based access control (RBAC). The access privilege management needs to be more robust and streamlined to enhance user access management. Additionally, improvements to the user interface could be beneficial."

"They should address the false positives generated in EASM. It is fetching assets that have Infosys as the keyword. They should fix that."

"Some areas that would be helpful are more comprehensive tagging and the ability to set up better dynamic rules."

"There can be further simplification to reduce the overall noise and provide ESAM-related data."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"The cost for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is high."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

"The pricing is market-competitive."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"Qualys offers excellent value for money."

"The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

Axonius is somewhat costly and has a price above average. It provides great value, but obtaining significant discounts can be challenging. As the tools are unique, they have limited direct competit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors. There are cases where Axonius doesn't have full compatibility with some newer solutions that have recently appea...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

The general use case for Axonius ( /products/axonius-reviews ) is cybersecurity asset management. My company, an IT solution provider, works with Axonius ( /products/axonius-reviews ) to offer both...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management helps us prioritize assets according to operating system, kernel version, installed software, and current version information. The ASM assists with attack surf...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

We are using Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for daily activities such as identifying new assets through network scanning and agent-based scanning for newly provisioned assets. When any new a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 33% of the time

ServiceNow vs Axonius

Compared 19% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 10% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Axonius

Compared 2% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 13% of the time

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

June 2025

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

May 2025

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides advanced real-time asset visibility, dynamic tagging, and External Attack Surface Management. It streamlines asset discovery and management using cloud agents and IP-based scanning, enhancing risk management and software lifecycle tracking.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a comprehensive solution for managing asset inventories and tracking software lifecycle states. It facilitates network visibility and supports zero-day vulnerability solutions, enhancing security posture through efficient monitoring. Users benefit from its cloud-based interface, which provides in-depth asset configurations and insights. Key features include automated vulnerability scanning and unauthorized software management, reducing manual efforts. The platform also emphasizes the importance of timely remediation and ongoing risk mitigation across multiple environments. Despite its strengths, users note the need for enhanced integration with additional CMDBs beyond ServiceNow, as well as cost efficiency improvements. Requests also include better report customization, more scan control, and a simplified UI.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Real-time Visibility: Offers continuous insight into asset status and condition.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows for flexible organization and assessment of assets.
External Attack Surface Management: Identifies potential threats from external sources.
Automated Vulnerability Scanning: Reduces manual scanning efforts and identifies vulnerabilities instantly.
Unauthorized Software Management: Detects and manages software not approved for use.
Asset Purge Rule: Automates the removal of obsolete assets from the inventory.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Posture: Gains stronger defense through effective asset monitoring.
Efficient Risk Management: Identifies threats quickly, enabling timely resolutions.
Improved Compliance: Assists in meeting industry standards and regulations.
Reduced Manual Effort: Automates repetitive tasks, saving time and resources.
Comprehensive Insight: Provides detailed data for informed decision making.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management enhances asset control by offering visibility into hardware and software configurations. It aids in maintaining security compliance and identifying unauthorized software, crucial for sectors with strict regulatory requirements.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

April 2025

Free Report: Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) vendors.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.