AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Spot are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 10.0, while Spot is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.4% mindshare in CCM, compared to Spot’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Spot users who would recommend it.

AWS Cost Explorer

Read 1 AWS Cost Explorer review

142 Views
52 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

512 Views
187 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

AWS Cost Explorer

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Cost Explorer and CloudCheckr based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 855,347 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Cost Explorer

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

11th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (29th), Managed Cloud Services (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of AWS Cost Explorer is 2.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 4.1%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

Clint Mitchell

Mgr Cloud Operations at freelancer

Maximized budget efficiency with accurate cost forecasting and responsive support

Primarily, I use AWS Cost Explorer to maintain cost and current budget constraints. Our FinOps team provides us with a budget for the month, and we track our spending to identify where funds are allocated. We have billing alerts set up to notify us when our infrastructure exceeds a certain amount…

Read full review

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the forecasting feature particularly valuable as it helps predict future expenses."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

Cons

"While there is always room for improvement, any needs for enhancement depend on specific requirements at the time. Currently, I cannot pinpoint any specific improvements needed."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

855,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Cost Explorer?

AWS Cost Explorer is part of the AWS package, so the cost is not directly associated with it. If you are using AWS services, you are already included in the cost structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Cost Explorer?

While there is always room for improvement, any needs for enhancement depend on specific requirements at the time. Currently, I cannot pinpoint any specific improvements needed.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Cost Explorer?

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

Comparisons

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs AWS Cost Explorer

Compared 52% of the time

More AWS Cost Explorer Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 21% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 19% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 17% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 10% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

May 2025

Download AWS Cost Explorer product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

June 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

No data available

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

AWS Cost Explorer is a powerful tool designed to assist users in managing and optimizing their AWS spending. It provides detailed insights and analysis to help organizations make informed budgeting decisions.

Cost Explorer offers extensive analytical capabilities that facilitate the monitoring and reporting of AWS expenses. By leveraging customizable dashboards and comprehensive reports, users are able to identify spending trends and detect anomalies quickly. This tool is crucial for tracking cost optimization strategies, enabling businesses to allocate resources efficiently and plan future budgets with greater accuracy.

What are the key features of AWS Cost Explorer?

Cost and Usage Reports: Create detailed reports for a complete view of spending patterns.
Forecasting: Predict future costs based on historical data and usage trends.
Reserved Instance Recommendations: Identify opportunities for savings with tailored purchase suggestions.
Resource Tagging: Organize and allocate costs using custom tags for better management.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Cost Efficiency: Monitor usage to maximize cloud investment and reduce unnecessary expenses.
Informed Decision-Making: Use data-driven insights to guide budgeting and purchasing strategies.
Improved Resource Allocation: Streamline asset distribution for optimal performance and savings.

Industries such as finance and retail use AWS Cost Explorer to fine-tune their cloud spending strategies, ensuring that resource allocation aligns with business priorities. Its analytics capabilities help sector-specific businesses to balance cost management with operational demands in dynamic environments.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

855,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.